logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns

Guns Like firearms themselves, there"™s a wide variety of opinions on what"™s the best gun.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-23-2007, 02:55 PM   #1
Nontypical Buck
 
stuckinthereeds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Helena Mt USA
Posts: 1,832
Default Ruger V. Remington

So, as some of you may know I have been looking for a new hunting rifle. I finally decided, (I think) on .270. However, the Remington .270 is $160 or so more than the Ruger. I couldn't find anyone to tell me why. Could it be just the remington name? What gives? And is it worth the extra $160?
__________________
Wherever you are, be there.
stuckinthereeds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 03:14 PM   #2
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: LOUISVILLE KY. USA
Posts: 135
Default RE: Ruger V. Remington

Depends on which model Rem and which modelRuger and personal preferance.
MR300WM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 03:17 PM   #3
 
millerhunter13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Where the big deer are from, seminole county FL
Posts: 1,436
Default RE: Ruger V. Remington

i would go with ruger, they make good rifled, but so does rem.
__________________
Member of Death by lethal injection
Fred Bear Instinct
PSE Nova hunter
Gold tip expedition hunters blazerd
125 grain muzzy
winchester model 37 410
H&R 12 ga
H&R 20 ga rifled barrel
CVA kodiak .45 with redhead 3-9x40
Marlin model 783 .2
millerhunter13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 03:46 PM   #4
 
Retaks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 2,313
Send a message via AIM to Retaks
Default RE: Ruger V. Remington

Either are good rifles. I think the Ruger makes a slightly better rifle though. Also have you thought about Tikka? I just got a T3 Stainless Lite for $608.
__________________
Im in the fast lane in the front seat
I wonder will i lose control and hit some tree
Just being young me
Retaks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 05:23 PM   #5
Nontypical Buck
 
SwampCollie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Where the ducks don't come no more
Posts: 4,366
Default RE: Ruger V. Remington


Quote:
ORIGINAL: Retaks

Either are good rifles. I think the Ruger makes a slightly better rifle though.
Based on what?

Personally I think that Remington's rifles blow Ruger's totally out of the water. The fit, finish, and accuracy are far and away better on Rems. If you get a good shooting Ruger, you probably got the 1 in 10 gun. About one in ten will be a real nailer. One in ten will also be a total dog. The other 8 will all shoot sub 2" groups. Just my experience, and I've only been selling, fixing and dealing professionally in guns for 7 years now. Been shooting a lot longer.
__________________
You get what you put in, and people get what they deserve. - Kid Rock
SwampCollie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 05:50 PM   #6
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: MB.
Posts: 2,988
Default RE: Ruger V. Remington

I find the action on the Ruger to be pretty sloppy compared to the Remington. Rugers are less in price and do come with a set or rings being a plus but I find Remington rifles a little better in quality. As for accuracy I can"™t comment on my Ruger because I haven"™t shot it yet , however my brother has never complained about his Ruger...
trailer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 08:48 PM   #7
Spike
 
robert4570's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Posts: 94
Send a message via ICQ to robert4570
Default RE: Ruger V. Remington

I've own 3 Rugers M-77 mk II,300 win mag , 30-06 , and the most recent addition a .270. All of myrifles are stock out the box and all good shooters, they are not match rifles . Ruger actions are control feed vs push feed on the Rems and I tend to favor Rem triggers , but thats just personel preference.

I also have several Rems with my newest being a CDL in 30-06 that I bought a few months ago they too are good shooters .
Overall you wont go wrong with either .

Decisions decissions .....

__________________
NRA LIFE BENEFACTOR
robert4570 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2007, 07:29 AM   #8
Giant Nontypical
 
bigtim6656's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,693
Default RE: Ruger V. Remington

well i think both shoot bothand see if you can andit might be more because it could be a newer model or it has more acceserys or just because it says rem. on it 90 of allguns your going to pay 30% for that name i had a marlin 3030 done just as good as the win but the win. said win on it so it was like 100 bucks more
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
If you want peace, prepare for war.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it's natural manure." - Thomas Jefferson
Team 17: Kickers and Stickers
bigtim6656 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2007, 09:48 AM   #9
c j
Typical Buck
 
c j's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 581
Default RE: Ruger V. Remington

I'dgo Ruger. Sturdy and dependable. Built tough. There's a reason the Mauser-style action has been *the* action for the last 100+ years.

Rugershave a reputation as having bad triggers, but the 'bad' ones aren't all THAT bad and the newer ones have been decent, even good. Either way, it's a cheap ($50 +/-) easy fix, so it's hardle even a knock against them anyway.

Fit and finish? Look for yourself. I find it laughable that anyone would say Rugers take a backseat in this area to a company that produces the 710.

Accuracy? I've had zero problems. None. Either the accuracy 'issues' that others have alluded to areexaggerated or I've been *really* lucky and just happen to get 'shooters' when I get a Ruger.

And yes, I realize it's just a rimfire, but when I shoot a Remington 597, I don't exactly get a warm fuzzy feeling that instills confidence in me that I'm dealing with a company who really cares about quality from top to bottom.
__________________
"When I found the skull in the woods, the first thing I did was call the police. But then I got curious about it. I picked it up, and started wondering who this person was, and why he had deer horns." --- Jack Handy
c j is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2007, 10:11 AM   #10
Nontypical Buck
 
Briman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Body in SE WI, mind in U.P.
Posts: 4,783
Default RE: Ruger V. Remington

Neither.

If you want a controlled feed rifle, buy a CZ.
If you want a push feed, get a Tikka.


__________________
Obamanfreude - 1. taking pleasure from the misfortunes of an Obama supporter as he or she is adversely affected by the policies of their Dear Leader.
Briman is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Remington 700 CDL .204 Ruger!! NYBigbucks Guns 1 06-02-2008 08:40 PM
New .280 rem in Ruger or Remington? absolut40 Guns 14 12-03-2007 08:58 PM
Remington 597 or a Ruger 10/22 RugerM77.270 Guns 22 11-28-2007 01:18 PM
Ruger Vs. Remington MovementShot Guns 39 04-15-2004 02:17 PM
Remington or Ruger? Ballistictip Guns 12 10-31-2002 10:47 AM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:05 AM.