logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns

Guns Like firearms themselves, there"™s a wide variety of opinions on what"™s the best gun.

View Poll Results: A poll
United States of America 30 48.39%
Third Reich 26 41.94%
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 4 6.45%
Italy 0 0%
Great Britain-Canada-Australia 1 1.61%
***an 1 1.61%
France 0 0%
Poland 0 0%
Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-25-2007, 07:12 PM   #21
 
metaldonnieg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tupelo, MS
Posts: 1,238
Send a message via AIM to metaldonnieg Send a message via Yahoo to metaldonnieg
Default RE: Who had the best weapons of WWII?

Quote:
ORIGINAL: mavwreck1975

Wait! France had weapons? What did they use them for?
beret holders
__________________
I wish I could put an image here...
[link]http://www.myspace.com/1817music[/link]
^^^my current rock band^^^
[link]http://www.myspace.com/fourtoomany[/link]
^^^my old metal band^^^
metaldonnieg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2007, 10:07 PM   #22
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Posts: 5,673
Default RE: Who had the best weapons of WWII?

The war was not won with superior weapons.It was won with superior numbers,and much greater manufacturing capability.
stubblejumper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2007, 06:17 AM   #23
Giant Nontypical
 
eldeguello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Texas - BUT NOW in Madison County, NY
Posts: 6,277
Default RE: Who had the best weapons of WWII?

The Krauts had better weapons except in the field of handguns and battle rifles. That is until July 1945 when the first nuc was detonated in New Mexico. From that point on, NO-ONE could match us, and it's been that way ever since!
__________________
"Bitte, trinks du das Wasser nicht. Dahin haben die Kuhen gesheissen."
eldeguello is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2007, 06:56 AM   #24
Nontypical Buck
 
younggun308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,661
Default RE: Who had the best weapons of WWII?

Did you see how the Pentagon has ordered some new aircraft? It's not the FA-22 Raptor, it's some other thing made by Lockheed, and it takes off vertically, because the engine rotates up and down, I think the History Channel did a documentary on it in Modern Marvels or something.
__________________
Jesus Rules!


younggun308 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2007, 08:26 AM   #25
Boone & Crockett
 
ipscshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 10,257
Default RE: Who had the best weapons of WWII?

Quote:
ORIGINAL: metaldonnieg

Quote:
ORIGINAL: mavwreck1975

Wait! France had weapons? What did they use them for?
beret holders

Nope... Flag Poles. Usually used for flying white flags...
ipscshooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2007, 08:49 AM   #26
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 4,554
Default RE: Who had the best weapons of WWII?

Quote:
ORIGINAL: younggun243

Did you see how the Pentagon has ordered some new aircraft? It's not the FA-22 Raptor, it's some other thing made by Lockheed, and it takes off vertically, because the engine rotates up and down, I think the History Channel did a documentary on it in Modern Marvels or something.
Yeah I watched the Episode on Modern Marvels "Military Movers." It looks pretty cool, can fly like a plane or a copter and can carry more than a Chinook. I guess it really isn't new, as has been in testing and development for something like 12 years or something. It looks like it would be the ultimate aircraft for Alaska or Cannada and getting in and out of hunting/fishing locals.
Red Lion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2007, 11:33 PM   #27
 
BigTiny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 3,145
Default RE: Who had the best weapons of WWII?

Had to go with the good old USA. Germans had great quality weapons, and issued the most pistols to ground troops; but in the end, the Germans were still trying to work that bolt action while our troops were firing semi-auto. They tried the sturmgewher late in the war but couldn't produce enough of them.
BigTiny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2007, 03:46 PM   #28
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Baileysville, WV
Posts: 2,929
Send a message via AIM to Doe Dumper Send a message via Yahoo to Doe Dumper
Default RE: Who had the best weapons of WWII?

That Mg-42 just fascinates me. The Garand was the best service rifle and Id say the 1911 was the best sidearm but massive amounts of men and manufacturing capacity won it for us.

Looking back at all of it now..had Hitler actually listened just a little to his generals the war outcome may have been much different. His arrogance and ego spelled doom for all involved with him.
__________________
Right Wing Extremist !!!
Doe Dumper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2007, 06:03 PM   #29
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 505
Default RE: Who had the best weapons of WWII?

The M1 changed the technology. The US had the ultimate rifle for the time. We out-thunk'um. The M1 Garand was so vastly superior, there needs no further discussion...except for the sore thumbs. Regards, Rick.
48thguns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2007, 07:03 PM   #30
Nontypical Buck
 
Briman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Body in SE WI, mind in U.P.
Posts: 4,783
Default RE: Who had the best weapons of WWII?

The Germans had two semiauto rifles gew-41 and gew-43. The GEW-41 was not as sturdy as the GEW-43 as it used a gas trap system like the earlier Garand designs. The Russians were also using SVT-40s before the US even entered the war, and produced large numbers of them.Both the SVT-40s, GEW-41, and GEW-43 rifles had an integral scope mountso that they could easily be outfitted with optics.The Swedish Ljungman rifle was vastly superior to the M1 Garand in that it had a detachable magazine, had a tightly closed receiver, was way ahead of its time using direct gas impingement operation (outside the action I might add so that it didn't 'poop where it eats' like another famous direct gas impingement rifle), and it was much more accurate to boot. Yes, Sweden was neutral, but the M1 and the men who carried them changed tactics, not technology.

The M1 was a great rifle on its own merits, but not anywhere near the best or most advanced. What sets the M1 apart was that the US had the industrial capacity to turn out a brand new M1 rifle on the average every 35 seconds, 24/7 during the entire war. No other country involved in the war had the ability to turn out a semi-automatic rifle at such a rate. Other countries created large numbers of submachineguns made out of stamped metal at very fast rates such as the Sten, MP-38, MP-40, and MP-44.

If there was a gun that revolutionized anything it would be the MP-44. It influences every standard issue infantry rifle today.
__________________
Obamanfreude - 1. taking pleasure from the misfortunes of an Obama supporter as he or she is adversely affected by the policies of their Dear Leader.
Briman is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WWII *** 7.7 UberSniper Guns 3 02-03-2009 10:27 AM
Terrorism and WWII Strut&Rut Politics 2 09-12-2004 11:42 AM
WWII Sniper Rifle trey78942 Guns 6 12-30-2002 09:58 PM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:03 AM.