logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns

Guns Like firearms themselves, there"™s a wide variety of opinions on what"™s the best gun.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-07-2006, 05:49 PM   #1
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northeast Tennessee
Posts: 5,673
Send a message via AIM to Matt/TN
Default Is this true?

well i heard a guy say today that he didnt like the .270 caliber because it didnt have the same knockdown power as a .308 or a 30-06? IS this true because ive seen 270's drop them in their tracks. Just wondering considering im buying a 270. As a side note i killed me a doe this weekend with the ol smokepole [8D]!! first with a muzzleloader!!!

__________________
Matt

Precision Shooting Equipment



"Safe is the enemy of greatness."
Matt/TN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 05:52 PM   #2
 
longrifle1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,688
Default RE: Is this true?

I doubt a deer could ever tell the difference.
longrifle1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 06:18 PM   #3
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,345
Default RE: Is this true?

1. Longrifle is certainly correct.

2. The term "knockdown power" is hottly debated. Bullets do not literally "knockdown" game animals. They do/can instantly incapacite them.

If you've got a gun that's in 270 or are looking at one you shouldn't feel the need for a bigger bullet on deer. (The 270 is just a 30-06 that shoots a slightly smaller diameter bullet.)
__________________
Anything I say is my opinion, just that...and only that.
"...and what does the Lord require of you, but to do justly, love mercy, and walk humbly with your God?
Soilarch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 06:32 PM   #4
Dominant Buck
 
Rebel Hog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: WC FL
Posts: 26,199
Default RE: Is this true?

I shot a .270/130gr NP for years! I have shot deer at 200 to 300yds atPower Lines and they just dropped. Don't let anyone one tell you that a .270 is not sufficient!
__________________
Jesus said, "he who stands firm to the end will be saved" Mark 13:13.

Live Life in such a way that those who do not know Christ will come to know Him because they know you

"In God We Trust"
Rebel Hog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 06:36 PM   #5
Nontypical Buck
 
TUK101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Spokane Washington
Posts: 1,042
Default RE: Is this true?

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Soilarch

1. Longrifle is certainly correct.

2. The term "knockdown power" is hottly debated. Bullets do not literally "knockdown" game animals. They do/can instantly incapacite them.

If you've got a gun that's in 270 or are looking at one you shouldn't feel the need for a bigger bullet on deer. (The 270 is just a 30-06 that shoots a slightly smaller diameter bullet.)
I agree with everything that Soilarch said. Before the big magnums and all of the gains that have been made with bullets and ballistics in the past 20 years the .270 was known for its flat shooting and bullet speed. The military still uses the .270 as its sniper round that is meant to kill. (The way that I understand it is the .223 is the snipers wound it round the .270 is the one where they mean bussiness). My great uncle used to win his fair share of competitions with his Winchester .270 back when everyone was hooked on the 30-06. The .06 has a bit more knockdown power and a bit wider range of bullet selection but the 270 kicks a bit less and still has the power to take down large game. Besides, its all about bullet placement in my book. It doesnt matter what gun you shoot if you cant put the bullet where its going to hit something vital.
__________________
Just a gun enthusiast looking to gain more knowledge.
TUK101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 06:38 PM   #6
Nontypical Buck
 
TUK101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Spokane Washington
Posts: 1,042
Default RE: Is this true?

Also, My family and I ( gread grandad, grandad, dad) have shot the .270 for years and it has always brought in the meat for us. My .270 has claimed 2 deer so far this year. (One by my daughter and one by my son).
__________________
Just a gun enthusiast looking to gain more knowledge.
TUK101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 06:44 PM   #7
 
longrifle1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,688
Default RE: Is this true?

Quote:
ORIGINAL: TUK101

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Soilarch

1. Longrifle is certainly correct.

2. The term "knockdown power" is hottly debated. Bullets do not literally "knockdown" game animals. They do/can instantly incapacite them.

If you've got a gun that's in 270 or are looking at one you shouldn't feel the need for a bigger bullet on deer. (The 270 is just a 30-06 that shoots a slightly smaller diameter bullet.)
I agree with everything that Soilarch said. Before the big magnums and all of the gains that have been made with bullets and ballistics in the past 20 years the .270 was known for its flat shooting and bullet speed. The military still uses the .270 as its sniper round that is meant to kill. (The way that I understand it is the .223 is the snipers wound it round the .270 is the one where they mean bussiness). My great uncle used to win his fair share of competitions with his Winchester .270 back when everyone was hooked on the 30-06. The .06 has a bit more knockdown power and a bit wider range of bullet selection but the 270 kicks a bit less and still has the power to take down large game. Besides, its all about bullet placement in my book. It doesnt matter what gun you shoot if you cant put the bullet where its going to hit something vital.
The military has never used the 270, for anything. They have, and still use the 308 win in bolt action sniper rifles and the M14. Some sniper rifles were chambered in 30-06, and they were used up into the Vietnam era. FYI
longrifle1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 11:21 PM   #8
 
BYRD250's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 226
Default RE: Is this true?

[/quote]
I agree with everything that Soilarch said. Before the big magnums and all of the gains that have been made with bullets and ballistics in the past 20 years the .270 was known for its flat shooting and bullet speed. The military still uses the .270 as its sniper round that is meant to kill. (The way that I understand it is the .223 is the snipers wound it round the .270 is the one where they mean bussiness). My great uncle used to win his fair share of competitions with his Winchester .270 back when everyone was hooked on the 30-06. The .06 has a bit more knockdown power and a bit wider range of bullet selection but the 270 kicks a bit less and still has the power to take down large game. Besides, its all about bullet placement in my book. It doesnt matter what gun you shoot if you cant put the bullet where its going to hit something vital.
[/quote]

They use the 308 round. Ive heard some talk of them using a 300 win mag as well. Never heard of them using a 270.
BYRD250 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2006, 01:09 AM   #9
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 140
Default RE: Is this true?

i agree with bullet placement if you hit them in the right place it doesnt matter i have seen whitetails dropped in there tracks at 75yards with a 22lr in the head maybe notdead but down for the count i mean the 243 is one of the most used deer guns there is so a 270 is plenty probably until you step up to moose and big bears then i would opt for a 30 cal of some sort
__________________
JSB
jsb57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2006, 07:11 AM   #10
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,435
Default RE: Is this true?

OMG another internet genius!

The military has never chambered a sniper rifle in 270. YOu got to be kidding me. Why do people feel the need to postcrap like this. The military sniper rifles shoot 7.62 NATO, otherwise known as the 308 win. The 1000 Yard rifle team shoots the M40 which is essentially a Remington Model 40X chambered in 300 win mag. Many of the sniper teams (ie seal teams) are going to the 50 bmg for the "strike the fear of god" effect. The only military cartridge shooting a 270 cal bullet, to my knowledge, is the new 6.8 SPC (thats 6.8mm Special Purpose Cartridge) which isgenerating mediocre reviews. It was designed to work on the M16 frame and bolt which is based on the 5.56 Nato otherwise known as the 223. So it is in essence a 223 necked up to 270.
__________________
"Well, If'n I had me a horse pistol like that.... I wouldn't be afraid of no bogger man." Rooster Cogburn
ShatoDavis is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone know if this is true? Windwalker7 Northeast 18 07-07-2007 09:49 PM
Yes it's true... RobinAim Low Bowfishing 25 11-22-2006 04:48 PM
Is it true that?????????????????Please Look buckmaster_88 Bowhunting 8 10-23-2003 10:05 AM
is this true Huntm Up Bowhunting 4 09-22-2003 07:11 PM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:04 AM.