logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns

Guns Like firearms themselves, there"™s a wide variety of opinions on what"™s the best gun.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-23-2006, 03:49 PM   #1
Nontypical Buck
 
squirrelkilla23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: marshallville, ohio
Posts: 3,221
Send a message via AIM to squirrelkilla23
Default ? vs ?

How does the 30-06 range in size of caliburbetween 270, 30-30, 30-06, and the .300? what i'm asking is please put them in scale from least to greatest power. also, what the heck kinda shell do you use in the 7x57 or any of the other x calibers? what designation do they have and where do you find ammo for them?
__________________
Two Rules of Life: Risk Everything;; && Regret Nothing

#4 on metro's list
squirrelkilla23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2006, 04:05 PM   #2
Boone & Crockett
 
James B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wall SD USA & Jamestown ND
Posts: 11,476
Default RE: ? vs ?

The 30-06, 30-30, 308 and all of the 300 Mags are .308 caliber. The 270 is a .277 caliber. The 7MM Mag, 7X57, 280 and 7mm-08 are all .284 caliber. The difference in these cartridges is the size of the brass casing and the amount of powder they hold. Walmart and most good sporting goods stores sell ammo for most all of these. UIf you really want to learn, pick up the book, Cartridges of the World or a good reloading Manual like the Hornady set. The 6MM and 243 are .243 caliber. Most all the 22's are .224 caliber.
__________________
Freedom. Use it or loose it.
James B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2006, 04:28 PM   #3
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 248
Default RE: ? vs ?

30-30,7x57, 270 30/06 and .300(if it's a magnum)
ncpreacherboy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2006, 08:17 AM   #4
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 4,579
Default RE: ? vs ?

iys tricky but it can be figured out, there are many basic cases usually named by the man or company which introduced them and some history behind them will usually explain the name
30-30 was a popular blackpowder cartridge firing a 30 caliber bullet in front of 30 grains of blackpowder.
7x57 started life as the 275 Rigby but was changed to a metric designation a 7mm bullet (284 dia.) and a 57 mm long cartridge case ( the same case as the 8x57, 257 roberts and 6mm Rem)
270 The 30/06 case with the neck stretched 50 thousands longerand necked down to .277 dia
30/06 military designation 30 cal adopted by the army in 1906
300 could desinate many 30 cal casings depending on what follows that number
theres a 300 savage, 300 WSM, 300 win mag, 300 weatherby mag, 300 H&H mag, 300 Remington ultra mag.
hope this helps
RR
__________________
Born To Hunt, Forced To Work.
Ridge Runner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2006, 08:55 AM   #5
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blissfield MI USA
Posts: 5,295
Send a message via Yahoo to Paul L Mohr
Default RE: ? vs ?

The easiest way is to browse some ammo manufacturers sights, like remington, winchester and Hornady. They all list speeds, energy figures and trajectories of the various shells and calibers. This is a good way to compare them as to performance.

Some will over lap depending on how they are loaded.

For the ones you listed as far as power goes I would rate them like this.

30-30 least powerful, good deep brush caliber though at shorter distances. lOT's of deer have been taken with this caliber in the midwest would be my guess.

30-06 and 270 are pretty close in my opinion with the edge going to the 270 for deer. Depending on the loads you use I think the 270 shoots a bit flatter and tends to be a fairly accurate caliber. I believe the 30-06 has a bit more power down range though. I would have to look them up to compare them, and I didn't. That is something you can do on your own. Both are extremely popular rounds and you can find ammo for them anywhere. The 30-06 is considered a DO ALL cartridge and one of the most popular loadings in history would be my guess.

The 300 win mag (I assume that is what you are talking about) is the most powerful of the bunch. It has more range and more power down range with the flatest trajectory. The down side is it is most likely expensive to shoot, has more recoil and would do a fair amount of damage to deer sized game. This is more of a long range weapon, or large game weapon, like moose or something like that. My opinion anyway.

And there are a ton of calibers you left out that fall in between there. Like the .308 and 7mm mag. Or 25-06 and .243.

Paul
__________________
I didn't climb to the top of the food chain to eat carrots! (Ron White)
Paul L Mohr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2006, 10:27 AM   #6
Nontypical Buck
 
Pawildman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: S.W. Pa.-- Heart in North Central Pa. mountains-
Posts: 2,508
Default RE: ? vs ?

To echo what ridgerunner said, the metric calibers use the designation of bullet diameter by shell length, just as a 2x4 is known as a 2 by 4 in the lumber business.
__________________
What the hell was that ??
Pawildman is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:01 AM.