logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns

Guns Like firearms themselves, there"™s a wide variety of opinions on what"™s the best gun.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-18-2006, 07:49 AM   #1
Typical Buck
 
bigpapa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carrollton, GA
Posts: 749
Default x40 or x50?

So I've decided that the Ruger M77 MKII is going to be my choice for my next rifle in 30-06. I'm planning on placing a Leupold VX-II on top. The only question is should I get a standard 3x9x40 or pay the extra $50 and get a 3x9x50. Any suggestions would be very helpful. Is it worth the extra doe? (pardon the pun) Also, is there anything I'm missing with this decission that would make me reconsider scope or power?
Thanks.
__________________
"I love it when they call me bigpappa, put you hands in the air"...

Support your local outdoors dealer. Mine is:
Barnes Store
Carrollton, GA
770-832-9013
bigpapa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 08:18 PM   #2
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Posts: 5,673
Default RE: x40 or x50?

I prefer 40mm scopes because they can be mounted lower which provides a better cheek position on the stock.
stubblejumper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 08:21 PM   #3
Boone & Crockett
 
James B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wall SD USA & Jamestown ND
Posts: 11,476
Default RE: x40 or x50?

I could never see much advantage to the 50MM.
__________________
Freedom. Use it or loose it.
James B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 08:27 PM   #4
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 357
Default RE: x40 or x50?

I agree go with the 40 my leupold is only a 3x9x40 and you could shoot easy way after legal hours with it I think you picked the perfect power though Just something about a 30-06 and a 3x9 like 2 peas in a pod
__________________
Make'em bite worm!
bigiron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 08:28 PM   #5
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: MB.
Posts: 2,988
Default RE: x40 or x50?

I would go with the 3-9 x 40 mm and save that extra $ 50.00 for something else. I did have the Leupold 3-9 x 50 mm for a short while and even thought it was a good scope with a good field of view the 40mm would sit lower on the rifle and work just as well. As for power the 3-9 is a good choice for that 30-06. Good luck...
trailer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 11:48 PM   #6
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location:
Posts: 2,052
Default RE: x40 or x50?

You might wanna hold off on the Leupold purchase right now. "A lil bird told me" that with some new scopes and technology Leupold is about to release 50mm scopes that you can nearly put on LOW rings!!!

Stay tuned too a ShotShow near you! lol
RA

ps
To answer your question though, no a 50 is NOT an advantage on a 9x. If you were talking about the 4x12 I would recommend the 50. As long as you keep the pupil above 4mm at any given power you will be happy with its twilight performance!
RedAllison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 01:12 AM   #7
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,345
Default RE: x40 or x50?

50mm cost more, puts the center farther from the bore and weights more...all for what?

Go 40mm you'll never reap whatever benefits the 50 would give. Just my 2cents, I shoot bushnell banners and a tasco on my 10/22...so what do I know[&:]
__________________
Anything I say is my opinion, just that...and only that.
"...and what does the Lord require of you, but to do justly, love mercy, and walk humbly with your God?
Soilarch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 06:56 AM   #8
 
tykempster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 270
Default RE: x40 or x50?

I got a Leupold catalog and they have new scope with an "indented" bottom, that kind of hugs the bore. Supposedly now you will be able to have extremely large lenses, I've heard up to 70mm...
__________________
Small kid with big guns.
Look at that .13 C-T-C group!
tykempster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 08:11 AM   #9
 
reddog132's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellensburg, WA.
Posts: 124
Default RE: x40 or x50?

Here's a picture of the new Leupolds.


reddog132 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 08:31 AM   #10
 
reddog132's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellensburg, WA.
Posts: 124
Default RE: x40 or x50?

Side view.


reddog132 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:32 PM.