logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns

Guns Like firearms themselves, there"™s a wide variety of opinions on what"™s the best gun.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-09-2005, 10:00 AM   #1
Nontypical Buck
 
coolbrze0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,626
Default 150 vs. 165 gr. whitetail loads

In shooting my 30-06, I've noticed that the 150 gr. and 165 gr. Remington Core-Lokt PSPsboth group well. As far as I can tell, there is no difference between the 2 in terms of accuracy. Which one would be a better choice for whitetails and why?

Also, they are both the same price...
__________________
Playboy Kennels - Got rabbit? ~ (703) 989-4079 ~ PlayboyKennels@gmail.com

Home of FC OTIS' BIG JOHN

Past home of FC DEATON'S BO & FC DEVIL'S HOLE HONEY BEE
coolbrze0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 10:07 AM   #2
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Western Nebraska
Posts: 3,371
Default RE: 150 vs. 165 gr. whitetail loads

Both kill deer well. I like passthrus and the heavier bullets are slightly better at making exit holes.....go with the 165.
Vapodog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 10:23 AM   #3
Giant Nontypical
 
skeeter 7MM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 6,882
Default RE: 150 vs. 165 gr. whitetail loads

I know a number of guys who use 150 gr, equally just as many that use up to 180gr for whitetails, it boils down to accuracy and situation why they choose what they do. Obviously accuracy is moot, so I would then ask yourself what the situation is and pick the appropriate bullet accordingly. ie: If your shots are likely to stretch out 200 or further and/or aim for the boiler room (ribs) then 150 might be better due to it's slightly flatter trajectory. However if you don't expect to shoot longer ranges or most likely 100 yardsor so and/or may take a through bone shot the 165 maybe a better fit.

Either will get it done on whitetail if the guy squeezing the trigger does his!
skeeter 7MM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 10:15 PM   #4
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 383
Default RE: 150 vs. 165 gr. whitetail loads

Quote:
ORIGINAL: coolbrze0

In shooting my 30-06, I've noticed that the 150 gr. and 165 gr. Remington Core-Lokt PSPsboth group well. As far as I can tell, there is no difference between the 2 in terms of accuracy. Which one would be a better choice for whitetails and why?

Also, they are both the same price...
Well, take your pick if there is no difference in accuracy. Both of course would do well when Deer is considered.

There are people who wouldactually consider using a.223 REM. when hunting Deer. You will do fine with either bullet weight.
FastShootingCarts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2005, 12:05 AM   #5
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Baileysville, WV
Posts: 2,929
Send a message via AIM to Doe Dumper Send a message via Yahoo to Doe Dumper
Default RE: 150 vs. 165 gr. whitetail loads

I have killed deer with 150, 165, and 180....take your pick. Either way ol Bambi wont ever know what hit him cept the ground. Id go with whatever grouped best.
__________________
Right Wing Extremist !!!
Doe Dumper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2005, 11:55 AM   #6
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 6,245
Default RE: 150 vs. 165 gr. whitetail loads

I'm with the majority. Take your pick. The deer will never notice the difference. The 150 is probably moving slightly faster but the 165 more than likely has a bit heavier jacket for a more controlled expansion on heavier game like bear or elk and you will more than likely get better penetration with the 165 on a quartering shot. Broadside, both should pass through but the 150 will probably open up more causing a larger wound channel.
__________________
PLEASE NOTE THAT DUE TO THE RISING COST IN AMMO PRICES I WILL NO LONGER BE FIRING A WARNING SHOT.

A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take away everything you have.
I'm not as good as I'm gonna get - but I'm better than I used to be.
"Life without God is like an unsharpened pencil - it has no point."
bronko22000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2005, 02:01 PM   #7
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North West Arkansas
Posts: 422
Send a message via AIM to firstshot
Default RE: 150 vs. 165 gr. whitetail loads

I'd go with the 150's on whitetail. You should still get pass throughs. Shooting 165 Nosler partitions in my 06 it seemed like they didn't open up much at all. I just think that on whitetails the 150 is all you need and you'll get a bit more velocity and flatter trajectory

firstshot
--------------------------------
Make your first shot count!
firstshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2005, 05:29 PM   #8
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 604
Default RE: 150 vs. 165 gr. whitetail loads

You will find the trajectories of the 150 and 165 to be nearly identical due to the BC of the 165 being higher than the 150. The 165 will also buck the wind much better on a long shot. So you have equal trajectory, less wind drift, and better penetration with the 165. I say 165.
Scott Gags is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2005, 06:08 PM   #9
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 46
Default RE: 150 vs. 165 gr. whitetail loads

I preferthe 165's but both do the job

TrophyTracker is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone ever try BL-C2 in .223 loads? HighDesertWolf Reloading 10 03-06-2007 06:36 AM
Target loads vs.Hunting loads? sam52 Black Powder 7 04-26-2006 07:21 PM
Buffalo County Whitetail Adventures / 2700 acre Trophy Whitetail Hunts / No fences!! laird Hunts/Outfitters 3 10-04-2005 12:27 PM
Any loads out there for a .35/284 ? .358 Reloading 0 04-08-2004 08:56 PM
77/50 Loads doc623 Black Powder 3 12-18-2002 12:13 PM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:03 PM.