logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns

Guns Like firearms themselves, there"™s a wide variety of opinions on what"™s the best gun.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-18-2005, 03:59 PM   #1
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location:
Posts: 282
Default .357 or .44 Mag

I'm looking into getting into handgun hunting and i can't decide betweet the 357 or 44 mag. I will be hunting whitetail most of the time and an occassional black bear. What do you guys think?
__________________
SEMPER FI, HUNT UNTIL YOU DIE!
NAHC LIFE MEMBER
WILDLIFE FOREVER MEMBER
MarineStud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2005, 04:22 PM   #2
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,288
Default RE: .357 or .44 Mag

Well, you can kill deer with a 22. However, bear can hunt back. Thus, I would leave the .357 to anti-personnel and go to the .44. Also, former USMC here, too. By the way, for sporting arms I am very partial to single actions. I find that they handle recoil differently and are a joy to shoot.
__________________
Mess Chief, Ft Arroyo
"Tucson sweet. Best chili in the Saguaro."
biscuit jake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2005, 04:30 PM   #3
Nontypical Buck
 
liquidorange's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,157
Default RE: .357 or .44 Mag

when bears are part of the hunt there should be no question. go with the 44mag. i re-load for mine with 300 grain hornady xtp bullets and im loving them. i would go with a heavy bullet and skip the 240gr-s
__________________
thats what im tryin to say...
liquidorange is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2005, 04:33 PM   #4
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brighton Michigan USA
Posts: 3,025
Default RE: .357 or .44 Mag

I would also recommend a 44. I owned a .357 and found it to be very easy to shoot and control. I later became concerned about it's effectiveness beyond 50 yards. I tried firing a buddy's .44 and thought (incorrectly) that it was too much gun for me. It was a short barreled and lightwieght model. I was wrong when I figured that I couldn't handle the .44. It was the small lightweight gun in .44 that was hard to handle. I settled on a .41 magnum and although I'm not sorry I bought it I will step up to a .44 magnum or larger in the future. A properly balanced single action quality hunting pistol with a barrel length to maximize your ammo's potential should not pose any handling problem. With a little pratice mostshooters can learn to control the .44.
8mm/06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2005, 06:41 PM   #5
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 383
Default RE: .357 or .44 Mag

.44 mag or take a look at the .454 Casull (a cartridge for big game hunting).
FastShootingCarts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2005, 07:58 PM   #6
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wabash, IN
Posts: 823
Default RE: .357 or .44 Mag

Yeah, for hunting purposes - I agree with the rest..........go with the bigger caliber. .357 is marginal on hogs - and I would imagine pretty much worthless on bear. An 8" (or longer) barrelled .44Mag would make a nice hunter.
__________________
"Every moving thing that liveth, I give unto you as meat" (Gen 9:3)

Trust God..........but keep your powder dry!
Mark whiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2005, 08:23 PM   #7
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Salem VA Salem, VA
Posts: 753
Send a message via Yahoo to TScottW99
Default RE: .357 or .44 Mag

I agree with the rest, .44magnum. Ruger in either Super Redhawk or Blackhawk with a 7 1/2" barrel would be nice, as would a T/C Contender or Encore. Good luck!
__________________
" A vote is like a rifle: its usefulness depends upon the character of the user."

Theodore Roosevelt

http://tscott.fws1.com

ONE NATION UNDER GOD!
TScottW99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2005, 08:27 PM   #8
Nontypical Buck
 
Ruger-Redhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,877
Default RE: .357 or .44 Mag

Another vote for the 44 mag or 454 Casull.Leave the 357 for a two legged human creatures.. I would recommend going with something with at least a 6 1/2"bbl.I like the Ruger Redhawks or the SRH's. For a back up Iwould suggest looking for one of the new Ruger Alaskan's in 454 Casull or the 480 Ruger.

Ruger Redhawk
__________________
**** NRA Patron Life Member ****

Ruger Redhawk
Ruger-Redhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2005, 08:49 PM   #9
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: A shack in Arkansas
Posts: 2,029
Default RE: .357 or .44 Mag

Hey how bout a 380!

I like a 357mag and have taken a few deer with them. but for bear i would go with a 44 mag if you have decided on the two calibers. i will second ruger with the 454 . i would go with it if i were gonna get a traditional handgun caliber for hunting.
Personally i would take a look at T/C encores.you have a large selection of powerful calibers and the ability to change without a big cost.
__________________
SOUTH ARKANSAS REBEL
soarkrebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2005, 09:28 PM   #10
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Virginia
Posts: 776
Default RE: .357 or .44 Mag

357 or 44 mag.?
Go with the 44 Magnum! Check out the Ruger Redhawk for a double action revolver, the Ruger Blackhawk for single action, and the TC for single-shot. All are excellent firearms, and will give you years of good service.
Leave the 357mags. at home - good for pers. defense, but on the
small side for big game hunting, and definitely underpowered for
bear.
Another option however, you might want to look into the 45Colt.
Most factory loadings are mild, but there are some that will keep right up with the 44mag., and a few that will surpass it in power.
Can really be awesome if you handload it.
Again, the Ruger Redhawk, Blackhawk or a TC will do.

Virginia7 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:12 PM.