logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns

Guns Like firearms themselves, there"™s a wide variety of opinions on what"™s the best gun.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-04-2005, 11:29 PM   #1
Nontypical Buck
 
zrexpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,624
Default little article on Karamoja Bell

Nice little read.
http://www.rifleshootermag.com/ammunition/centerfire_22_biggame/
zrexpilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2005, 11:44 PM   #2
 
Slamfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rocky Top Tennessee
Posts: 683
Default RE: little article on Karamoja Bell

Not exactly about Bell, is it? However it does raise a good point, it doesn't take much to kill if you get a bullet into the brain or heart. However you must get it there. I believe there is a criteria you can use to guesstimate penetration, sectional density. Next to bullet construction this number tells you more about the penetrating qualities of a bullet than does velocity. I like a bullet with a sectional density of .250 for catch as catch can hunting where you might shoot a deer, black bear, boar or even a sheep. Bullets with that kind of density include 125 grain 6.5mms and165 grain .30s. the .270s 130 grain and 7mms 140 grain bullets are only a tiny bit less. All known for their deadlyness on medium game up to roughly 400 lbs. How many .22 bullets can claim such a figure?
__________________
Jest an ol' man livin' in the mountains.
Slamfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2005, 06:33 AM   #3
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,288
Default RE: little article on Karamoja Bell

Looks like the 75 grain .224's run a SD of .214; about as good as it gets, but it calls for twist that reportedly tears the usual varmint bullets up just due to spin. I was grateful when the Army decided the old 5.56 ball was just too light and went to a heavier bullet and lower twist. But I am retired now (hope it stays that way!) so I will have to let the Mattel Toy live out its silly life.

Interesting that Boddington excluded the .22 Hornet, which has (roughly) the same foot lbs as a .357 Mag at 100 yards. Heh, heh, I read an old article from back in the days the .357 was introduced, some gun writer guru took it out for Grizzly. We would commit him in these parts. Hope I haven't offended those hunting the big bear with 357's. We all have our thing.
__________________
Mess Chief, Ft Arroyo
"Tucson sweet. Best chili in the Saguaro."
biscuit jake is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ma Bell bawanajim Politics 1 08-16-2007 01:28 PM
Sometimes, it's about ringing your own bell DHF:KYLEN Turkey Hunting 5 02-19-2006 09:44 AM
Bell Ammo KonaBoy Hunting Gear Discussion 0 08-23-2004 09:30 AM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:45 AM.