logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Fishing Forum > Freshwater Fishing

Freshwater Fishing Discussion of all aspects of freshwater fishing.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-09-2008, 01:10 PM   #1
Fork Horn
 
drs1961's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 389
Default Mercury in fish question

Our DNR and DHEC have updated their fish consumption advisory now listing certain bodies of water [most of our coastal plain rivers!] as "Do not eat any" of the catfish because of mercury contamination. Other areas have "One serving a week" or "One serving a month" advisories. Obviously the mercury levels in those areasare low enough that it dissipates out of our bodies for continued consumption. My question for anyone much more learned on the subject thanI is if fish from those "do not eat areas" were caught, tagged,and released alive into other bodies of water not contaminated [private ponds], would the mercury levels in their bodieslikewise diminish over a period of time so that they would be safe for consumption?
__________________
Single Shots and Single Actions, the old way. Retired! Life is Good!
drs1961 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2008, 03:52 PM   #2
Dominant Buck
 
Chuck7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 23,567
Default RE: Mercury in fish question

I don't know my friend..
__________________
The Day I Saw Jesus
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p20E0nA7pZI
Chuck7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2008, 05:12 AM   #3
Nontypical Buck
 
thundermug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jax beach Fl. usa
Posts: 3,725
Default RE: Mercury in fish question

No. Once mercury has entered the flesh it never does get out. It is sort of "stuck". If I remember correctly, the mercury actually is stuck in the liver of the fish which is where the fat is also stored. However, as the blood circulates it carries some with it.

One thing to be aware of is putting a contaminated fish into an area not contaminated can actually spread mercury contamitnation to other fish. The spread would happen as the original contaminated fish were to die and it's body get consumed by microbes and the food chain starts all over again. The contamination per fish would not be as bad as for the original fish.

As for finding a body of water that is mercurcy free? I think someone will find a snowball in hell first.
__________________
It's fixed.
thundermug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2008, 06:59 AM   #4
 
indianahunter83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Terre Haute, Indiana
Posts: 914
Default RE: Mercury in fish question

Even the canned tunafish you buy in the sotre has levels of mercury in it. Levels high enough that they suggest pregnant women should not eat it!
__________________
Only rabbits are allowed to have thin skin. Are you a rabbit?
indianahunter83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2008, 10:30 AM   #5
Fork Horn
 
drs1961's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 389
Default RE: Mercury in fish question

Thanks for the info thundermug. That's what I was wondering. So much for that plan. Iwas just reading an article from our local power co-op discussing the mercury contamination and they stated that "We know of only four mercury poisoning events ever recorded worldwide. And they are all linked to unusual occurrences of extended, direct exposure or consumption. None were in the United States." So is DHEC's warning overkill or maybe too encompassing of everyone. They seem to emphasizethe harmful effects on pregnant women's embryonic developmentand children still growing. Brain development I believe is their big one. But what about us olderadults that have been exposed our entire life to everything that they saywill killus and our tired brains aren't half working anyhow much less still developing. Will eating the mercury tainted fish make ussenile quicker? Maybe a new excuse-I mean reason-for becoming more forgetful.
__________________
Single Shots and Single Actions, the old way. Retired! Life is Good!
drs1961 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2008, 04:36 PM   #6
Boone & Crockett
 
Champlain Islander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: On an Island in the west coast of New England
Posts: 13,131
Default RE: Mercury in fish question

You don't get rid of it or have it go away. What enters your system stays there. I would pay attention to the advisories.
__________________
Too busy with fishing to spend much time here.
Champlain Islander is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help from a Mercury outboard tech ransrods Freshwater Fishing 5 08-12-2009 03:13 PM
115hp Mercury outboard carpsniper Fishing Gear 2 07-19-2008 11:04 PM
Mercury Optimax opinions??? Gundigest Freshwater Fishing 6 05-14-2008 08:42 PM
Mercury Tubes in rifles? Goose_Getter Guns 7 03-26-2005 07:16 PM
Mercury Recoil Suppressors cwhitenton Guns 3 04-09-2004 11:18 AM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:49 PM.