logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Firearm Review Forum

Firearm Review Forum Rifles, shotguns, blackpowder, pistols, etc... read the latest reviews of hot new firearms here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-30-2006, 06:47 PM   #1
Typical Buck
 
jag-mag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: west central,wi
Posts: 823
Default Nikon which one?

I bought a 7400 this yr for deer season. Im looking at a 3x9x40 Nikon
Pro-Staff for 150.00, I noticed today that Gander Mt has a 2x7x32
Pro-Staff for a 130.00, Its not the 20$ difference in price at all. Which scope wouid suit my rifle and my hunting area best? I hunt mosly river bottoms, running or troting shots are the norm, once in awhile a long shot presents itself. The 2x7 is smaller and lighter, which scope would I be
better off with.
__________________
Bowtech Justice
Easton st epics n-fused, 100GR Wac em's
Rip Cord Red,Blazers
Vibracheck Stabilizer
Trophy Ridge Sight
jag-mag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 06:58 PM   #2
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: IOWA/25' UP
Posts: 7,145
Default RE: Nikon which one?

I'd go with the wider view and get the 40mm
hardcorehunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 08:25 PM   #3
 
bklyn215's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: brooklyn ny
Posts: 143
Send a message via AIM to bklyn215
Default RE: Nikon which one?

i do 3x9x40 i have that on my 30-30 and love it it very clear it's great and that is a good price i bought mine in jan and paid 200 or alittle less but its great
__________________
bad day of hunting is better than a good day at work

http://www.northeasternoutdoors.com/
bklyn215 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 10:03 PM   #4
Nontypical Buck
 
Rammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 2,864
Send a message via AIM to Rammer
Default RE: Nikon which one?

I'd also go for the 3-9x40 for the extra light gathering capabilities and greater view of field.
Rammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2006, 09:33 PM   #5
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location:
Posts: 2,052
Default RE: Nikon which one?

as heavy the 7400 is I doubt you'll notice the decreased size and weight of the 2x7 vs the 3x9. The one thing I can say about the 2x7 is that with it's lower mounting height, quicker mounting and shot placement should be possible with it vs the higher/larger 3x9. I put a 2x7x32 (Monarch) on my sons first gun last fall (mdl 7 youth .243) and it is a great scope and doesn't give up anything too most 3x9s. If you were asking about a short, light rifle I would say 2x7 all the way. But since it's a heavy fencepost like the 7400...

3x9!
RA
RedAllison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 05:13 AM   #6
Nontypical Buck
 
Mike Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,310
Default RE: Nikon which one?

For a couple bucks more I woud go with the upgrade and get the Nikon Buckmaster its so much brighter there is no comparison. Mike
__________________
Correction Officers: We walk the toughest beat in the country!
Mike Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 06:43 PM   #7
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ludington michigan USA
Posts: 280
Default RE: Nikon which one?

The 2-7x32 is going to give a larger field of view than the 3-9x40. Seven power is way more than enough for deer hunting with a 7400. A couple of years ago I shot an antelope at 425 yards using a 2-7x32 monarch mounted on a .25-06. I also shot prairie dogs at 250 yards with the same rig.
biggunz.45-70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2006, 09:07 AM   #8
Typical Buck
 
dvdegeorge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: WNY USA
Posts: 900
Default RE: Nikon which one?

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Mike Hill

For a couple bucks more I woud go with the upgrade and get the Nikon Buckmaster its so much brighter there is no comparison. Mike
+1
__________________
It's not an obsession...it's a way of life
dvdegeorge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2006, 01:49 PM   #9
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 28
Default RE: Nikon which one?

get the 3x9x40
__________________
My wife say if i go hunting one more time shes gonna leave me......oh well I'm gonna miss her.
pineywoods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2006, 03:49 PM   #10
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,288
Default RE: Nikon which one?

Where I have been in Wisconsin, I don't know where you will need the 9 power. I got my son a 2x7 Nikon, as he hunts hills & woods. I wanted a wider field of view. I think it also balanced the rifle better.
__________________
Mess Chief, Ft Arroyo
"Tucson sweet. Best chili in the Saguaro."
biscuit jake is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
F/Sale : Nikon D90 : 420$/Nikon D300 : 900$ dig19 Upland Bird Hunting 1 02-03-2009 01:39 AM
Selling Brand New Nikon D3 12.1MP DSLR Camera +Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G dec111 Hogs and Exotics 2 12-24-2008 07:07 AM
Nikon Prostaff 550 or Nikon Archer's Choice kevanddj Whitetail Deer Hunting 0 10-25-2008 04:54 PM
Muzzleloader - Nikon Prostaff or Nikon Omega - Why? Absolute Giant Optics 1 05-29-2008 06:58 AM
Nikon Buckmaster and Nikon Monarch 800 Range Finders losthwy Bowhunting 3 07-22-2007 03:24 PM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:27 PM.