logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Firearm Review Forum

Firearm Review Forum Rifles, shotguns, blackpowder, pistols, etc... read the latest reviews of hot new firearms here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-31-2005, 06:04 PM   #1
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,345
Default .204vs.17remington

For the handloader:
I already have a 22-250 but since rifles are not legal for deer in my state and deer are the biggest things here I've started looking at going down the catridge ladder instead of up. I already have an assortment of rimfires and so I'm looking at the 17rem and the new .204 I'm personally leaning to the 17. You are going to have to buy special equipment to clean either. Most my shots will be within 200yards with the normal being right at 100. (we're talking crows and coyotes). I've already compared ballistics on paper...just want to know if people have any real-life advice or experience pertaining to game-performance or what the performance ceilings are for the handloads.

Thanks
__________________
Anything I say is my opinion, just that...and only that.
"...and what does the Lord require of you, but to do justly, love mercy, and walk humbly with your God?
Soilarch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2006, 10:41 PM   #2
 
Coyotestalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 534
Default RE: .204vs.17remington

I prefer the .204 over the .17 Rem. Your concern on cleaning products shouldn't be a worry. The .204 in my book does the better job in what I look for in a smaller, high velocity cartridge.
__________________
I am reminded everyday that life is too precious by my best friend, Lt. Ken Ballard, who lost his life while serving in Iraq. He fought for our freedom, to do what we do, and how we do it. Hunt till you drop!
Coyotestalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2006, 04:03 PM   #3
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 283
Send a message via Yahoo to hobie11
Default RE: .204vs.17remington

i would go with the .204 cause it shoot as fast if not faster than the .17 rem at around 4200 fps and has more energy. go with the .204 youll like it better.
__________________
Then God said,"Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth and over all the creatures that move along the earth" genesis 1:26
hobie11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2006, 11:30 AM   #4
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location:
Posts: 91
Default RE: .204vs.17remington

Ya know... newer is ALWAYS better! Or so it would seem.But not for me.I am a .17 fan. Coyotes and smaller, no problems out to 300 yds.
Viking_hunter is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:28 PM.