That is all I am going to say, I think some people need to go back and use the tutorial.
__________________
" If he smells you its over. If he gets in your wind stream its over, If he smells where you walked, he probably aint coming back... Your talking about an animal that can smell a fingerprint. Any amount over 0% is to much." Dan Infalt
guys is this directed at my buck?? I've only ever scored a handful of deer. I am no proffesional scorer by any means, so if you think i messed up please let me know.
This is for fun people, pictures can be deceiving, I would hope that no one would knowingly add inches. Some look bigger than they score some look smaller.
__________________
Just a regular guy who likes to hunt
That is exactly right, pictures can be decieving. I only had a question on one, I redid the possible score in my head and I was close...when he sent me other pictures...I had no doubt....I think we're right on with all of them thus far.
Just an fyi... I am having mine scored by someone other than myself. I would rather have it scored accurately then have it be questionable.
Just something to consider... it is much easier to question a small rack buck then a large rack buck. You can easily add 10-15" on some big rack bucks and no one would ever doubt it. Try it with a small buck and it will be questioned 9 times out of 10.
Let's just have fun. There's nothing to win and all in good fun.
Compare Lefty26's 7 point that scores half of ToddGraf's Monster. Yet Todd's rack is easily 4 times larger. (just as comparison only - nothing insinuated here at all)
I'd like to see a scoring system that is more representative of the true size. For example, scoring by volume / points / then spread - as in how much volume would the antlers displace in a tub of water, then how many points, then spread.
So Todd's deer would score something like: 5000/8/17
(5000ml water displaced / 8 points / 17" spread) paints a better picture to me than 143 6/8