Would you support a doe only season...
#21
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: winchendon mass
Posts: 411
RE: Would you support a doe only season...
[quote]ORIGINAL: Soilarch
ya if the population can support it and the area need it then yes i would suport it
Like others have said...when season begins I take the first good piece of meat that walks my way....in fact, if I have a preference I'll take 130# doe over a 140# buck (provided he's not 10# of antlers )
#22
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: West Central Illinois
Posts: 55
RE: Would you support a doe only season...
I can see what you are saying and somewhat agree but........ In this hypothetical situation I am not talking about giving extra doe tags to an area or state, just eliminating the buck harvest for a year.
A year! HELL NO!!!!!
Not needed in IL.
#25
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Memphis TN USA
Posts: 3,445
RE: Would you support a doe only season...
No ,
it's nothing more than "trophy management" , something I'll never support . If you want less does then shoot more does
it's nothing more than "trophy management" , something I'll never support . If you want less does then shoot more does
#26
RE: Would you support a doe only season...
A year! HELL NO!!!!!
Not needed in IL.
Not needed in IL.
I figured IL would benefit greatly from a reduced buck harvest for a year. I believe any state with a buck limit of greater than one buck would have tremendous results.
#29
RE: Would you support a doe only season...
I would if it was deemed necessary due to the buck/doe ratio being badly out of whack. But at this time, at least in my area I see no need for it. I wouldn't mind a 1 buck limit for all seasons though.
#30
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: winchendon mass
Posts: 411
RE: Would you support a doe only season...
[quote]ORIGINAL: jerseyhunter
lol that blows thats why there was so many bucks all the does were dead lol
Anoha, no way Jose, All I saw was bucks ,and I hunt in an Earn a buck zone.