Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Archery Forums > Bowhunting
Rage Hypodermic vs Steelforce Phat Head >

Rage Hypodermic vs Steelforce Phat Head

Community
Bowhunting Talk about the passion that is bowhunting. Share in the stories, pictures, tips, tactics and learn how to be a better bowhunter.

Rage Hypodermic vs Steelforce Phat Head

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-13-2014, 08:17 AM
  #1  
Spike
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 59
Default Rage Hypodermic vs Steelforce Phat Head

I've narrowed down my choice of broadheads this year to the Rage Hypodermic and the Steelforce Phat Head...of these two I'm looking for opinions on which is a better choice. I had used the classic Rages in the past but was disappointed in reliability, durability and sharpness. But I just read somewhere that these problems have been corrected with the updated Hypodermic? Thanks!
pmsmith2032 is offline  
Old 08-13-2014, 08:26 AM
  #2  
Nontypical Buck
 
AF Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Iowa (Heartland USA)
Posts: 3,249
Default

When Rage first came out I heard time and time again how great they were from people on the forums. Like a fool I bought some and had issues with them every time. I went back to the company site and found that what the people were saying on the forums was exactly the same thing on their site. I almost believe now that the ones on the forums work for the company. If you had problems with Rage before, why would you go back and throw good money after bad? I personally stick with 3 blade Muzzys and don't have any problems at all with them and won't switch anytime in the foreseeable future.

So, I would say my advice to you is make your own decision based upon what you think and don't listen to what others say.
AF Hunter is offline  
Old 08-13-2014, 09:11 AM
  #3  
Nontypical Buck
 
wallhangr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wentzville, MO
Posts: 1,375
Default

Like AF, I remember all the fanboys on here back then as well. Although there were a few that changed their tune once they used them in the field. I tried out a mechanical head once (actually a hybrid) but after having not so stellar results, went back to the tried and true Muzzys and Thunderheads.
wallhangr is offline  
Old 08-14-2014, 04:52 PM
  #4  
Boone & Crockett
 
bronko22000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 12,745
Default

I would not recommend the Rage for light poundage bows simply because of the energy required to achieve a pass thru. IMO the hypodermics appear to be a better design as far as penetration is concerned. I shoot the Rage with my PSE DNA at 65# because it has plenty of KE to easily pass thru a broadside or slightly quartering deer. Bigger animals like elk or moose or big bears I would use a strong fixed blade.
My daughter-in-law shoots a Martin set at 40# and I have her shooting Muzzy Phantoms. Another great fixed blade for lower poundage bows is the Slick Trick Viper Trick.
bronko22000 is offline  
Old 08-20-2014, 05:26 AM
  #5  
Fork Horn
 
ojibwa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: GA
Posts: 357
Default

all I can say about rage is... I have two buddies who are whitetail outfitters and they hate rage broad heads and will not allow them on their properties.....


on the other hand they both love Swhackers...
ojibwa is offline  
Old 08-20-2014, 09:17 AM
  #6  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 406
Default

If those are the two choices you have narrowed it down to, I would go with the Steelforce Phathead. I have used mechanicals with great success, but fixed blades are simplyone less thing to worry about. I actually had to go to the website and look through the selection at Steelforce and I am impressed.

IMHO, you have tried the Rage. Now try Steelforce and report back to us on flight, accuracy compared to field points, penetration, devastation, blood trail, etc... Give us a complete review so others who are also considering a change have a real world result to go from.
Kathwacckkk is offline  
Old 08-21-2014, 03:35 PM
  #7  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Southampton Pa BUCKS CO
Posts: 2,492
Default

I use the 125gr Phathead TT steel. They are one tuff head at .080 thickness. With my setup 70lb Elite Answer, Easton FMJ arrows with the Phathead 505 gr total arrow weight they blow thru deer. They fly great but are only a 1 inch cut . Your blood trails will be better with the Rage but the Phathead is a GREAT STRONG head. You can also send them back to Steelforce and they will re-sharping them for free. Use the Phathead, you will be happy with them. Good Luck.

Hatchet Jack
hatchet jack is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.