Cutting Diameter

[stabnslab_WI]

When it all comes down to it, which broadhead has the biggest cutting diameter. Having an argument with a co-worker. He thinks his 2-blade "rage" broadhead creates more hemorrhaging. I think my 1" 4-blade tricks do. That give me 4 inches of cutting diameter. If im wrong let me know and I'll never bash rage again.

[constant]

I am a newbie but i would think the rages diameter would be bigger because the diameter is the distance across from one point to another

[stabnslab_WI]

Originally Posted by constant

I am a newbie but i would think the rages diameter would be bigger because the diameter is the distance across from one point to another

Your right, I guess I wanted to know which broadhead is going to cause more hemorrhaging. The four "1 inch slick trick" or the 2-blade rage

[brucelanthier]

Cutting surface - The rage has 2" of cutting surface and your ST has 2" of cutting surface. The rage cuts with one 2" line while the ST cuts with 2 1" lines. They have the same amount of cutting surface.

[YooperMike]

Bruce is right. Go with the Slick Trick Mags, or a bigger fixed blade, and you beat the rage in CUTTING SURFACE. Cutting diameter, whole 'nother story.

[stabnslab_WI]

Ah, I see now........thanks guys.

[SwampCollie]

As to which one will cause more hemmoraging..... the sharper one that goes where it is supposed to go.

Neither one of them are worth a damn in the dirt... though I suspect the ST will hold up better when taking on the forrest floor.... your chances of pulling a Jed Clampet are about the same either way.

[GMMAT]

I'll take my chances on the one that goes all the way through the deer.

[drockw]

Originally Posted by GMMAT

I'll take my chances on the one that goes all the way through the deer.

Exaclty. Regardless of how big, small, or whatever...