Quote:
ORIGINAL: GMMAT
Quote:
|
Alot of these younger bucks take to new areas the following year I believe.
|
I agree that a lot of these little guys have ever expanding home ranges.....but it would make sense if they were replaced with other deer of the same age structure,........wouldn't it?
If this is the case (they disperse and have larger ranges than their older counterparts).....doesn't it make passing on them futile? I mean....I have no desire to kill these juveniles.....but I can see where people might take a different approach if they thought they were going to disperse from their properties, anyways.
Interesting.....ya gotta admit.....to not even see ONE of them.
|
Schultzy makes a great point.
GMMAT- you're right its deffintely weird to have not even seen one of them, especially out of 16 bucks. I think pressure (as everyone has said) may have played an active role, but not the extent that 16 bucks should disperse. If there were 16 bucks all in the 1.5-2.5 year old age range, then it would be common for many of the bucks to relocate their home ranges. Still, out of 16, one buck should have emerged as the dominant and declrared that territory as his and you should have atleast seen him.
It would make sense for other bucks to have replaced them in the age classes. Did you see a greater or lesser amounts of 1.5-2.5 year old bucks during the 07 season?
What is your property makeup? How many acres do you have? Do the neighboring landowners pass on younger bucks as well?
Sorry for asking so may questons, this really struck the weird button for me.