logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Black Powder

Black Powder Ask opinions of other hunters on new technology, gear, and the methods of blackpowder hunting.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-06-2011, 03:52 AM   #1
Spike
 
Kopfjaeger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Northern IL.
Posts: 55
Default question about load pressure

I'm shooting a Thompson center Triumph .50Cal, Barnes spitfire 285gr sabot with 120gr charge of blackhorn 209 powder. When I chronographed this load the velocity was between 2,230 and 2,254 fps. Which seems really fast for this load. I shot 9 different strings through the chrono. Can this be caused by how hard it is to load the Barnes bullets with the yellow sabots? I already bent the ramrod. And can this cause dangerous excessive pressure when fired? This is a great load combination that groups 3/4" at 100yds and 2 inches at 200yds. Thanks...
__________________
Mathews Utra 2 @ 26"draw and 67lbs, Copper John sight, Wiskerbisket rest, Goldtip arrows, and Wasp SST broadheads total weigt 353gr.

In God We Trust!
(Semper Fi)
Kopfjaeger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2011, 04:24 AM   #2
Fork Horn
 
donjose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 369
Default

Yes if you bent your ram rod there could be a issues did you mark your ram rod to make sure you have the same depth everytime?
Everyone on here that has a Triumph has stated they ended up JB the bore for easier loading.


http://www.huntingnet.com/forum/blac...c-triumph.html
__________________
CVA Optima 50 Cal
CVA Mag Hunter 50 Cal
Thompson Center Hawken Cougar 50 Cal

Last edited by donjose; 11-06-2011 at 04:27 AM.
donjose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2011, 05:00 AM   #3
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Rapid City, South Dakota
Posts: 1,400
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kopfjaeger View Post
.............................the velocity was between 2,230 and 2,254 fps. Which seems really fast for this load. I shot 9 different strings through the chrono. Can this be caused by how hard it is to load the Barnes bullets with the yellow sabots?......................
My guess is, your chronograph was/is optimistic.
ronlaughlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2011, 05:08 AM   #4
Nontypical Buck
 
Muley Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,080
Default

I was going to say that too, but that is a strong load of powder. Probably more than needed.

What are you hunting?
__________________
Accuracy is everything.........Wyatt Earp
Muley Hunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2011, 05:29 AM   #5
Boone & Crockett
 
cayugad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 17,921
Default

All I would say is.. if the load is so hard to get down the barrel that you bent a ramrod.. this might not make a good hunting load. If you want to continue shooting this load, I would look for a better ramrod. When I loaded Barnes MZ Expanders in the red sabot in my Black Diamond they were "stiff" to load, but not impossible. And their accuracy was exceptional. Although I was not pushing them any where near what you are. Perhaps see what other sabots are out there and what effect they have on your bullet load.

The other side of the coin is.. if the velocity is even close to being true, (and with no first hand knowledge and experience I have no reason to doubt) and the accuracy you are getting is that good.. I can see why you're hesitant to switch. I mean, you are in center fire rifle area numbers, with a monster bullet. That would make an excellent hunting round. I mean, what could stand up to a bullet of that weight and that velocity, along with Barnes quality?

Does the second round load easier then the first round?
__________________
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, a total wreck, screaming Yahoo, with a big smile on your face."
cayugad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2011, 05:48 AM   #6
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,748
Default

Kopfjaeger
First off Blackhorn is a progressive burning powder. This means that the higher the pressure the faster it burns and produces more pressure.
Second to answer your questions. It is quite possible to get these velocities with Blackhorn by loading it extremely tight. Since the normal pressure for 120 gr of Blackhorn is 15 % below the normal pressure of 777 and it gets the velocity it achieves by burns longer at peak pressure it is probable that your load does not exceed safe limits this can not be told for sure with out pressure testing.
Because a load that causes bent ramrods is not convenient for normal use I suggest you try a slightly thinner sabot or polish your barrel with 100 full length strokes of JB Bore Paste, this should relieve the loading problem as polishing tends to make things slide easier.
__________________
Lee
lemoyne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2011, 09:38 AM   #7
Spike
 
Kopfjaeger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Northern IL.
Posts: 55
Default

Thanks everyone. the 285gr bullets are easier to load now that I've put close to 100 rounds through it. Still need to get a new ramrod. when using this bullet and 150gr of 777 pellets and 777 primers I was getting around 2,043 fps, then when I went back to the Blackhorn 209 and cci primer using a barnes 250gr spitfire came out a blazing 2,275 fps. I was thinking about backing down the powder some due to the recoil and having a shallow eye relief on my scope could be painful, just can't keep the groups as tight.
__________________
Mathews Utra 2 @ 26"draw and 67lbs, Copper John sight, Wiskerbisket rest, Goldtip arrows, and Wasp SST broadheads total weigt 353gr.

In God We Trust!
(Semper Fi)
Kopfjaeger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2011, 09:45 AM   #8
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,748
Default

The next time you are looking at scopes take a look at the Nikon Omega it has 5 inches of eye relief, some do not like the circles for the longer distance shooting but I find them very convenient as they give 3 reference point per circle.
__________________
Lee
lemoyne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2011, 10:09 AM   #9
Spike
 
Kopfjaeger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Northern IL.
Posts: 55
Default

I looked at the nikon 300bdc, and the leupold saber. I didn't like there reticule patterns seemed too cluttered and their narrow field of view. I ended up buying the vortex diamondback 3-9x40 bdc very nice scope just too small of an eye relief.
__________________
Mathews Utra 2 @ 26"draw and 67lbs, Copper John sight, Wiskerbisket rest, Goldtip arrows, and Wasp SST broadheads total weigt 353gr.

In God We Trust!
(Semper Fi)
Kopfjaeger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2011, 12:59 PM   #10
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 333
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kopfjaeger View Post
I'm shooting a Thompson center Triumph .50Cal, Barnes spitfire 285gr sabot with 120gr charge of blackhorn 209 powder. When I chronographed this load the velocity was between 2,230 and 2,254 fps. Which seems really fast for this load. I shot 9 different strings through the chrono. Can this be caused by how hard it is to load the Barnes bullets with the yellow sabots? I already bent the ramrod. And can this cause dangerous excessive pressure when fired? This is a great load combination that groups 3/4" at 100yds and 2 inches at 200yds. Thanks...
Consider changing to the TEZ's (blue sabot). My Triumph loves them. I'd say they load just right
johnnyo is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:38 PM.