logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Black Powder

Black Powder Ask opinions of other hunters on new technology, gear, and the methods of blackpowder hunting.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-09-2011, 10:22 AM   #1
Boone & Crockett
 
cayugad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 17,921
Default Old Style Inline Rifles are still working fine

Today I wanted to shoot since it was a beautiful sunny day. I was going to grab one of my newer inline rifles when I saw the old CVA Stag Horn Magnum hiding in the corner. I felt sorry for not shooting it more. So out it came.



The rifle is not fancy. It was an $89.00 rifle new. And then topped off with a $39.00 scope. So not a big investment in this one. But it always was a good shooter. And I remember it liked 90 grains of Pyrodex RS or Goex. So since I have a lot of Goex but almost out of Pyrodex RS.. it was Goex time.

I looked through my wall of bullets and picked some .430 diameter .44 caliber Hornady 240 grain XTPs. I some green crushed rib sabots. I also saw some of the pure lead bullets I cast from a LEE 405 mold. Normally they weigh 423 grain but I have not weighed these. I grabbed some of the orange Knight .458 sabots and headed out the door.



I set the target at what would normally be 75 yards, but forgot that when I mowed the lawn I moved the bench table. A range finder told me it was 68, 69, and 68 yards. So I decided that was good enough.

I loaded on a squeaky clean barrel. The first shot was low. But my card said it was sighted in at 50 yards. I then did not swab, wanting to see how hard it would be to load a second shot on a fouled bore. It was hard!! I really thought I was going to have to pull the breech plug and push that load out. But using the range rod was finally able to seat the bullet. Shot #2 was a little higher, and that did not surprise me seeing how hard it was to load. But then I started swabbing and shot 3-6 and actually this was a good group, but I was surprised it was this high.

So I swabbed the barrel clean. I then reset the target and got back to the bench. I knew these were a large heavy bullet so I was kind of excited about seeing how they would shoot.



While that group is not real tight.. consider being hit by that 423 grain all lead bullet. All of them in that group at 68 yards would have been in a kill zone of a deer. And that should be a good hard hitting load.

These old open breech rifles I know are avoided now days. Every one wants a clean foul free easy to clean rifle. But in reality, these old open breech rifles, like this Staghorn were a good accurate hunting rifle. All you need do is work up a good load.

This will be my loaner muzzleloader this year, should the need arise.
__________________
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, a total wreck, screaming Yahoo, with a big smile on your face."
cayugad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2011, 10:38 AM   #2
Giant Nontypical
 
falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Comanche Co., OK
Posts: 8,884
Default

That is some good shooting. Guns get a lot more expensive than the StagHorn but they don't shoot much better.
falcon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2011, 12:32 PM   #3
Boone & Crockett
 
cayugad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 17,921
Default

I have to agree.. that rifle would have met all my hunting needs.
__________________
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, a total wreck, screaming Yahoo, with a big smile on your face."
cayugad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2011, 01:33 PM   #4
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,449
Default

Nice shooting Dave.
I like the plunger style inlines best. Wait, come to think of it all the inlines I own now (Knights and Whites) are plunger style guns. I'm really not feeling too inadequate with them needer.
Art
__________________
"Just because you're paranoid it doesn't mean everyone is not out to get you"
flounder33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2011, 01:39 PM   #5
Nontypical Buck
 
Brknarrow1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North Cackalacky
Posts: 1,134
Send a message via AIM to Brknarrow1970
Default

Great group, I dont have any experience with inlines but like the looks of that compared to mine earlier wished I would have take photos
__________________
Live each day as it was your last- don't do anything you will regret later on
Brknarrow1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2011, 01:58 PM   #6
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 6,233
Default

Dave you are right, I am sure those big heavy bullets would leave a mark. And that very first bullet out of the clean barrel being only an inch low, would have definately put venison in your freezer. So for under $130 - that's a deal any day in my book.
__________________
PLEASE NOTE THAT DUE TO THE RISING COST IN AMMO PRICES I WILL NO LONGER BE FIRING A WARNING SHOT.

A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take away everything you have.
I'm not as good as I'm gonna get - but I'm better than I used to be.
"Life without God is like an unsharpened pencil - it has no point."
bronko22000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2011, 02:40 PM   #7
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location:
Posts: 217
Default

are those 45-70 bullets?
__________________
hunting RI
stripercrazy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2011, 02:55 PM   #8
Boone & Crockett
 
cayugad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 17,921
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stripercrazy View Post
are those 45-70 bullets?
Yes the bullet that I cast is meant for the 45-70 Government cartridge. Lee sells the mold. I got them because they are nice to shoot and I size them down to a .451 and shoot them out of my White Model 97.
__________________
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, a total wreck, screaming Yahoo, with a big smile on your face."
cayugad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2011, 03:18 PM   #9
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Saxonburg Pa
Posts: 2,085
Default

Cayugad, why is that considered a magnum ML? Maybe i should say, what is considered magnum ML? 150grns of powder by volume???
Grouse45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2011, 04:31 PM   #10
Boone & Crockett
 
cayugad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 17,921
Default

This was one of the CVA rifles that could handle three pellets. It will not handle 150 grains of loose. And it is considered a "magnum" because it is stamped on the side of the barrel Stag Horn Magnum.

I have shot three pellets out of it, but the accuracy was terrible and the recoil was too much for my liking. I have found that the rifle for some reason likes 90 grains of loose powder. That's hardly a magnum charge or anything compared to the kind of loads you shoot.
__________________
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, a total wreck, screaming Yahoo, with a big smile on your face."
cayugad is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:05 PM.