logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Black Powder

Black Powder Ask opinions of other hunters on new technology, gear, and the methods of blackpowder hunting.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-18-2010, 12:26 PM   #1
Spike
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 5
Default BH209 illegal in New Mexico 2011

The newest 2011-2012 New Mexico Proclamation is out and I was shocked to read that on page 6 under Definitions and Terms it says:

Muzzleloader
Includes rifles and shotguns in which the charge and projectile
are loaded through the muzzle. Only black powder, Pyrodex
or an equivalent substitute may be used. Smokeless
powder, including “Blackhorn 209” powder is illegal. Legal
muzzleloading shotguns are those capable of being fired from
the shoulder only. Muzzleloaders may use in-line ignition,
pelleted powder, sabots, belted bullets and scopes. See
Restricted Muzzleloader, next column.

Restricted Muzzleloader (for certain deer hunts)
Any muzzle-loading rifle (including a smoothbore flintlock or musket)
using open sights in which the charge and projectile are loaded
through the muzzle. Only black powder, Pyrodex or an equivalent
substitute may be used. Smokeless powder, including “Blackhorn
209”
powder, in-line ignition, pelleted powder, sabots, belted bullets,
multiple projectiles and scopes are illegal.

They allow Pyrodex, Triple 7, and other black powder substitutes but not BH209? This is crap. If you hunt in New Mexico or plan to apply for hunts here, and feel this is incorrect, be sure to contact the NM G&F and let them know this rule needs to change. Click here for contact information of NM G&F.
hntbambi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2010, 12:36 PM   #2
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,748
Default

Thats down right silly. I think they been out in the desert to long.
__________________
Lee
lemoyne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2010, 12:39 PM   #3
Giant Nontypical
 
MountainDevil54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Boncarbo,CO
Posts: 5,720
Default

they can ban powders all they want because its not what allows for long range shooting. Its the scopes that allow for long distance shots. Hell i got on video my brother in law shooting a deer from 175 yards with my Accura and a puny 105gr pyrodex RS charge. With open sights, no way that shot was doable
MountainDevil54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2010, 01:32 PM   #4
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kerrville, Tx. USA
Posts: 2,144
Default

So inlines, pellets, sabots, and scopes are OK but BH 209 is not??? Who did Western powder piss off in NM?
__________________
Venor ergo sum (I hunt, therefore I am)
txhunter58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2010, 01:41 PM   #5
Giant Nontypical
 
sabotloader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Idaho
Posts: 8,789
Default

What worries me, and i am not a BH shooter, but if one state starts the ball rolling.....
__________________
Keep on Shooting Muzzleloaders they are a Blast
sabotloader is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2010, 01:45 PM   #6
Giant Nontypical
 
sabotloader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Idaho
Posts: 8,789
Default

MountainDevil54

Quote:
my brother in law shooting a deer from 175 yards with my Accura and a puny 105gr pyrodex RS charge. With open sights, no way that shot was doable
Tell that one to Lee - think under the right condition and the right open sight that is a very doable shot.

People have long shot distances much greater than that with older less fancy muzzleloaders with open sights... And they continue to do it today.
__________________
Keep on Shooting Muzzleloaders they are a Blast
sabotloader is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2010, 02:44 PM   #7
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 157
Default

If I had the chance to hunt NM, my first shot would be with whats most accurate in my ML, followed by whatever is legal. If a warden will make you break down a loaded ML just to inspect powder, then they don't care about the revenue hunting brings to an area. That type of enforcement will get out quickly, hurting the state and local communities. NM is not the only state with game, I'll spend my $$$ where it's appreciated. End of rant.

Last edited by smokey92; 12-19-2010 at 06:25 AM.
smokey92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2010, 03:51 PM   #8
Typical Buck
 
Chasam60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Upstate New York-Broome County
Posts: 592
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MountainDevil54 View Post
they can ban powders all they want because its not what allows for long range shooting. Its the scopes that allow for long distance shots. Hell i got on video my brother in law shooting a deer from 175 yards with my Accura and a puny 105gr pyrodex RS charge. With open sights, no way that shot was doable
I qualified on the rifle range at Parris Island with an M-14 and open sights(peep rear)Marine qualification at that time was 200 yds offhand,300 yds sitting and kneeling(slow and rapid fire)and 500 yds prone position.Very Doable. 175 yds should be a piece of cake.

Charlie
__________________
"Fathom the hypocrisy of a Government
that requires every citizen to prove
they are insured.... but not everyone
must prove they are a citizen"


Ben Stein
Chasam60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2010, 05:06 PM   #9
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Yucca Valley,Ca
Posts: 2,491
Default

Well fellas i hate to toot my own horn and i am "not" anti BH209 at all. but i have been saying this would happen on other forums for over a year. i never got into it on this forum, since some of the debates in the other forum got really ugly.utah is next,actually if you read there present regulations BH 209 is illegal to hunt with during the muzzle loader season.why? it specifically states no nitrocellulose based powders!.ever wonder why BH is so clean? i agree it should be allowed in all states,but i knew and have argued this would happen.states consider it to be a smokeless powder..
builder459 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2010, 05:09 PM   #10
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 157
Default

"states consider it to be a smokeless powder.."

If those "states" ever actually shot it.... (especially in a box/tent blind), it's far from "smokeless"

Last edited by smokey92; 12-18-2010 at 05:11 PM.
smokey92 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:49 PM.