logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Black Powder

Black Powder Ask opinions of other hunters on new technology, gear, and the methods of blackpowder hunting.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-07-2009, 12:27 PM   #1
Giant Nontypical
 
falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Comanche Co., OK
Posts: 8,884
Default CVA Product Liability/Injury Cases

Just found this in the web today.Many of these cases are the older CVA "recall" guns but some are newer guns. Will continue to use my CVA guns with moderate charges of powder.


http://www.cvaguncases.com/
falcon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2009, 01:57 PM   #2
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,819
Default RE: CVA Product Liability/Injury Cases

Thanks Falcon, I just checked, my CVA Wolf is of the 05 model year.
__________________
You've heard of the three ages of man - youth, middle age, and 'you're looking wonderful'.
Francis Cardinal Spellman
sjsfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2009, 06:47 PM   #3
Nontypical Buck
 
hunting junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: indiana
Posts: 1,579
Default RE: CVA Product Liability/Injury Cases

I don't have a cva newer than 99.But when i ordered the 209 kit for my staghorn they did make me tell them the serial # first,
B
before they sold it to me.Great info falcon.
__________________
mathews switchback xt,hd11 conv.rest,sts,string splitter
max.hunter 350 arrows,Rage 2 blade.
H&R 12 Guage Slug gun. (Flame thrower)
T/C Pro hunter
Quad-300 Crossbow



Hunting a way of life,no hobby
hunting junkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2009, 08:58 AM   #4
Spike
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 58
Default RE: CVA Product Liability/Injury Cases

A very helpful site.

The site has a page that lists thelawsuits against other muzzleloaders manufacturers. I looked at the links for Knight, andseveral lawsuits are listed. All the lawsuits against Knight are for patent infringement or trademark infringement. None of the lawsuits against Knight are for personal injury.
cantremembermyid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2009, 12:14 PM   #5
Fork Horn
 
Catus Magnus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 329
Default

I like CVA; I think they make good arms, great value. I'm on my 2nd one.
Catus Magnus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2009, 02:58 PM   #6
Giant Nontypical
 
falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Comanche Co., OK
Posts: 8,884
Default

Deleted by falcon.

Last edited by falcon; 07-10-2009 at 03:03 PM.
falcon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2009, 03:37 PM   #7
Spike
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location:
Posts: 87
Default

I am not bashing anyone but not all lawsuits are just. I was doing a Google search for another reason and came across this lawsuit against Knight. A guy mistakenly stored his loaded rifle in his house with the plunger against the primer. He is preparing to go out hunting and he realizes his mistake, does not have the secondary safety on, pulls back the plunger while pointing the loaded rifle at his hunting buddy. The plunger slips from his hand and the rifle goes off shooting his buddy in the leg. He turns around to sue Knight because they did not specifically warn him that this could happen. You decide who is at fault.

http://www.ai.org/judiciary/opinions...2310701ewn.pdf
Reese260 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2009, 06:56 PM   #8
Boone & Crockett
 
cayugad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 17,919
Default

Reading case law can be very misleading. Many times law suits are not settled for reasons of guilt but instead reasons of cost effectiveness. Always keep that in mind.

Now I am not overlooking the reports of CVA rifles failing. Any time a rifle fails and someone is injured, this is tragic. I would never make light of that. I have owned a CVA for many years (2003) and shot thousands of rounds out if it. Am I just lucky or is this a time bomb ticking? I really do not know the answer to that. Am I going to keep shooting it? Yes I guess I am.

If you have any doubts of the integrity of your rifle, I strongly urge you not to shoot it. If these reports you read give you reason for doubt, sell the rifle and get one you are comfortable with. If you abuse your rifle, then keep that in mind. If you are one that likes to push more in a load then a recommended manufacturer charge, you are playing with fire.

If you maintain your rifle, use manufacturer recommend loads, and are comfortable with the quality, you should have a rifle that serves you well.
__________________
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, a total wreck, screaming Yahoo, with a big smile on your face."

Last edited by cayugad; 07-10-2009 at 06:59 PM.
cayugad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 03:40 PM   #9
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 679
Default

if people would concentrate more when they are loading they're ML on the range .most of these accidents would not happen ..DOUBLE LOADING your ML [any make] will produce a "PIPE BOMB" ...this spring we had an accident on the range the shooter was very lucky he only lost the tip of his right hand thumb ...he double loaded his ML ..i will not mention the make of the ML .because it was not defective.
heinz57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 11:29 AM   #10
Fork Horn
 
Catus Magnus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 329
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reese260 View Post
I am not bashing anyone but not all lawsuits are just. I was doing a Google search for another reason and came across this lawsuit against Knight. A guy mistakenly stored his loaded rifle in his house with the plunger against the primer. He is preparing to go out hunting and he realizes his mistake, does not have the secondary safety on, pulls back the plunger while pointing the loaded rifle at his hunting buddy. The plunger slips from his hand and the rifle goes off shooting his buddy in the leg. He turns around to sue Knight because they did not specifically warn him that this could happen. You decide who is at fault.
www.ai.org/judiciary/opinions/pdf/12310701ewn.pdf
Well, if that's the story... then it is clearly OPERATOR ERROR, and not Knight's fault in the least.

I sometimes leave my muzzleloader loaded for a couple/few days, in decent weather - leave it in the car, to avoid condensation! - but never, never leave a primer in the breech plug. It doesn't get a primer until I am ready to walk into the woods, and the primer comes off when I get back to the car. And though I have considered doing it... I DO NOT like the idea of lowering plunger onto a primer. Very bad idea, just thinking about it. What if you drop it, smacks handle? All sorts of potential for bad things, there.

Take the damned primer off. Easy.
Catus Magnus is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Liability Release? Rhino259 Bowhunting 7 07-18-2008 05:52 PM
product testers needed for new product shursight Hunting Gear Discussion 7 09-01-2006 08:50 PM
Information product Liability Alsatian Politics 23 02-16-2005 09:26 PM
Trail Cam Liability forkhorn04 Bowhunting Gear Review 1 12-03-2004 02:54 PM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:00 PM.