spaniel
Quote:
|
Now I'm a relative young'un here so go easy on me if my understanding of history is off, but it is my understanding that the Partition is a relatively old design that was revolutionary in its time because of its ability to hold the bulk of the bullet together as bonded bullets had not really been introduced (or at least perfected) yet. At least that's always been my understanding of how things came about...I was probably 8 or 9 when I read this explanation so I may be wrong.
|
I believe your perception on this is correct also. The Nosler theory is realtively old, 1946 all because a big Canadian Moose refused to bow to a 300 H&H Mag. Nosler's theory evolved around the fact that he wanted a bullet to have a powerful impact at close range withoutout SHATTERING on heavy bone or on caked dryed mud - yet provide good expansion at the longer ranges. The bonding process, more than likely at that time was an unknown process. Even then I am not sure that would have answered the problem that Nosler was after. Bonding will hold the bullet together for the most part but it really does not insure uniform expansion as was one of the Nosler goals.
This might/maybe be a good example...
Here is a factory picture of an expanded perfectly mushroomed
bonded 300 grain Gold Dot
Yet in real life the bonded bullet does not offer a structure in the bullet that will hold the bullet from distorting. So when you recover them from real life shooting they go askew but the lead is bonded to the copper and weight loss is minimal.
It is also my contention that this skewing will also alter the flight path of the bullet as it passes through an animal - not that it is a huge problem. but i THINK I would like a bullet that will stay the course of the shot all the way through... I think the uniformity of this expansion offers a better chance of this happening.
Hopefully changing the mood of this thread a bit...