Se7en " I concur with everything you"ve said about the 1:38 twist as I have a Firehawk with that twist. Although I own an straight-shooting Encore as well, during last year"s Big Game season, I didn"t carry the Encore once, instead opting to carry the Firehawk with a nice conical load. My friends kept "commenting" how I was carrying around a 10 year old gun"if you catch my drift.
As I"ve said many times here, I also wish that TC would bring back the 1:38 and 1:48 twists in their in-line models. Can"t understand why they don"t. Yeah I know, Fox Ridge offers a .50 cal 1:48 barrel for the Encore, but at $275"I think I"ll pass.[:@]
Man, if TC ever offered a 1:66 or 1:70 in .58cal (or .54cal) for the Encore"well that would be the best!!!


I"d buy one in a New York minute. It just seems as though the ML newbies are mainly interested in high speed saboted loads. Not that there"s anything wrong with that load, mind you, but there"s something special about shooting PRBs and cutting the patch at the muzzle. Awesome.
My dilemma is that I like shooting PRBs, but I don"t care for the feel of the traditional ML, instead preferring the feel of the in-line. Maybe I subconsciously remember my wisdom teeth being shaken when I was 12 yrs old after touching off that .50 cal Renegade when it was loaded with 90gr of Goex and a PRB. I swear that that load has twice the kick of my .50 cal Encore that"s loaded with 110 and a 240gr saboted bullet.
Anyway, I hear you loud and clear about wishing that TC would introduce a "traditional modeled barrel" in the modern in-line frame. We can only dream"can"t we?
Let"s start a petition"