North american big game stats.. Or opinions
#11
Texas. Pound for pound the most meat. But be advised the average Texas rancher is not of a charitable disposition.
http://www.cattlerange.com/cattle-gr...e-numbers.html
Flags,
http://www.cattlerange.com/cattle-gr...e-numbers.html
Flags,
#12
Now that I understand the "purpose" of the question..............
The south has the additional benefit of milder winters.
http://www.ruleof3survival.com/
#13
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Allegan, MI
Posts: 8,019
Texas. Pound for pound the most meat. But be advised the average Texas rancher is not of a charitable disposition.
http://www.cattlerange.com/cattle-gr...e-numbers.html
Flags,
http://www.cattlerange.com/cattle-gr...e-numbers.html
Flags,
Texas would have more big game just like flags stated and your link is of no significance in this discussion because it's dealing with domestic cattle production, not wild animals, although come to think of it I have seen some pretty wild cattle down there on several ranches I hunted!
#14
The last place i'd go is Texas. I'll stay right where I am, but move up higher in the mountains. Hunting will too hard for the average person in the mountains. Keep in mind you won't have just hunters hunting, but everybody will be hunting.
The easier the hunting. The more people doing it. Just like it is right now.
The easier the hunting. The more people doing it. Just like it is right now.
#15
Although one Michigan mosquito will provide lunch and supper for a family of four.
#16
Not to worry Muley, the city and non hunting folks aren't going to decend to the wilderness to survive, they would all flock to the same place and huddle together waiting for the government to help them while they starved and killed each other over scraps.
#17
I don't hunt for whitetail anymore, so I just looked up what state had the most. The first one said Michigan, and I posted it. If I would have just thought about it I would have said Texas, but aren't they small? I'm not a fan of Texas.
#18
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Allegan, MI
Posts: 8,019
That's true, and we have no elk in Colorado.
I don't hunt for whitetail anymore, so I just looked up what state had the most. The first one said Michigan, and I posted it. If I would have just thought about it I would have said Texas, but aren't they small? I'm not a fan of Texas.
I don't hunt for whitetail anymore, so I just looked up what state had the most. The first one said Michigan, and I posted it. If I would have just thought about it I would have said Texas, but aren't they small? I'm not a fan of Texas.
#19
As far as the OP question. I'm with Pete. My big butt is hitting the hills either in Pa, TN, or CO.
#20
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Allegan, MI
Posts: 8,019
HA! I've had dogs bigger than Texas deer! Same for Florida deer too! Now granted some of them ranch raised stock deer get pretty big but a good many of those deer owe their genetic background to a Northern Bloodline! They are naturally small in ALL hotter climates. If you see a big bodied deer in Texas (and what I call big bodied is over 210 field dressed) then you can bet your bottom dollar that deer has a northern genetic line and somewhere CLOSE.
As far as the OP question. I'm with Pete. My big butt is hitting the hills either in Pa, TN, or CO.
As far as the OP question. I'm with Pete. My big butt is hitting the hills either in Pa, TN, or CO.
Last edited by Topgun 3006; 07-11-2015 at 05:37 PM. Reason: Spelling