logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > General Hunting Forums > Big Game Hunting

Big Game Hunting Moose, elk, mulies, caribou, bear, goats, and sheep are all covered here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-27-2007, 05:15 PM   #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9
Default .325 WSM vs. .338 Federal

Hi.
I'm looking at a new rifle for big game (moose) and considering one of the 2 calibers in <subj>.
I never shoot either of them, and am looking for inputs from current users.
Appreciate your help.
Dan
__________________
Thanks,
Dan
Aldebaran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2007, 11:46 PM   #2
EKM
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 599
Default RE: .325 WSM vs. .338 Federal

Of the two, 325 WSM.
IMHO, 338 Federal is weak.
338WinMag beats them both.

340 Weatherby, 338 RUM, or 338-378 would be my choice in that slot since I already have the 338WinMag.
__________________
Never go undergunned, always check the sight in, perform at showtime.
Learn from the mistakes of others, you won't live long enough to make them all yourself.
EKM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2007, 12:26 AM   #3
Typical Buck
 
SILVERTIP-CO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PUEBLO, CO, USA
Posts: 584
Default RE: .325 WSM vs. .338 Federal

I've recently seen several hunts on tv using the 338 Federal and I am NOT NOT NOT impressed. In all three huntsthe hunters had to keep pumping the ammo to the animal to kill it. If the 325wsm is close to the 338 then I would suggest neither. I think the WSM's are all hokey anyway as they do nothing that any other older calibre cant do.

Go for a REAL calibre like the 338 WinMag, or 340 Wby, or any of the RUM cals and get some horsepower in the gun for one shot kills. Heck the 7mm Rem Mag is almost as good as it gets, as is indicated by continuing top ammos sales figures.
__________________
NRA LIFE MEMBER
svenska50@hotmail.com
SILVERTIP-CO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2007, 09:49 AM   #4
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mckinney, Texas
Posts: 248
Default RE: .325 WSM vs. .338 Federal

Hmmm....Silver....you had me there for a minute! But to mention the "horsepower" calibers such as 338WM, Weatherby/RUM's and then to foul it up with the last sentence. The 7mm RemMag might be popular, and is a nice caliber, but please don't put it in the same paragraph with the others mentioned!
Without getting too off course, I would argue that with the 7mag (Rem not the Weatherby) is only marginally more potent than a .270 or .280, not enough difference to warrant it's popularity other than the word "MAG" is involved!!!

As per the original question....only you can be the judge. The .338 Federal is a milder kicking version of the .338.
The .325WSM is a blend of the .338 and the .300...."tweener". More bullet than a .300 and flatter shooting than .338. I like the caliber. But to each his own.
__________________
RedRiverHntr

Best learn to appreciate the little things in life.....there are a whole lot more of them!
RedRiverHntr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2007, 12:31 AM   #5
Giant Nontypical
 
skeeter 7MM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 6,882
Default RE: .325 WSM vs. .338 Federal

.323/8mm bullets are still on the short side therefor I really don't see any advantage to the 325wsm other then a fancy new name. The 300 wm doesn't lose much to the .325wsm IMHO and has more choice in bullets or ammo if you don't reload.

If your wanting a .338 bullet thenwhy look any further then the .338wm at least it will do what your hoping it too. If recoil is the reason then like aboveconsider the 300wm. .338 federal is real an answer to problem that didn't exist...just my opinion.

BTW, I currently use a 7mm rem mag and have had zeroproblems anchoring moose with it.It's agood fit to my situation flat for longer shots on deer sized game but can be loaded upto handle elk and moose with ease. Similar to a 300/.308cal it is just I have had good success with the .284 cal and bullet choices are vast allowing me to tailor it for the application.
skeeter 7MM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 08:50 AM   #6
 
Waterproof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 145
Default RE: .325 WSM vs. .338 Federal

I love my .325 WSM and sold my .338WM after killing several animals GYD with the .325. To each their own though. Between the two calibers you listed the .338 Federal is pretty anemic
__________________
"When it comes to my hunting my friends call it my passion, my ex-wife called it my obsession, It is a shame that none of them understand it is much more important then that" Rodney Rexwinkle
Waterproof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 10:35 AM   #7
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 6,230
Default RE: .325 WSM vs. .338 Federal

My Browning Micro Hunter in 325WSM topped with a Burris Short Mag scope is a joy to carry, is extremely accurate and as effective on elk as any 338WM. I shoot 200 gr Nosler Accubonds pushed by 68 gr of RL19. True the WSMs won't do anything another cartridge won't do (300WSM vs 300 WM, etc) but when you're carrying a rifle weighing in at just over 7 lbs all day to one weighing 9 or 10 lbs the difference gets noticed. And, I haven't seen a well madeproduction rifle (Browning, Savage, Winchester) chambered in a WSM that didn't shoot accurately. Can't say that about a 300 WM or 338 WM.
__________________
PLEASE NOTE THAT DUE TO THE RISING COST IN AMMO PRICES I WILL NO LONGER BE FIRING A WARNING SHOT.

A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take away everything you have.
I'm not as good as I'm gonna get - but I'm better than I used to be.
"Life without God is like an unsharpened pencil - it has no point."
bronko22000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 12:48 PM   #8
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9
Default RE: .325 WSM vs. .338 Federal

Thanks guys for your input.
I think I shall settle down for 7mm-08 Rem at the end.
__________________
Thanks,
Dan
Aldebaran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 02:04 PM   #9
EKM
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 599
Default RE: .325 WSM vs. .338 Federal

Wow. That is quite the lowering of expectations. What happened?
__________________
Never go undergunned, always check the sight in, perform at showtime.
Learn from the mistakes of others, you won't live long enough to make them all yourself.
EKM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 10:41 AM   #10
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location:
Posts: 2,387
Default RE: .325 WSM vs. .338 Federal

I have not shot the 325-WSM or 338-Federal. I never got bit by the short-magnum bug.

I recommend the 338-winchester magnum. The 338-R.U.M. or 340-Weatherby are also fine choice.
Wolf killer is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Federal Fusion vs Federal Blue Box soft points hometheaterman Guns 3 02-01-2009 09:27 AM
.338 Federal??? rafsob Reloading 4 04-28-2008 04:33 PM
Federal/atk MdDave Whitetail Deer Hunting 0 01-23-2008 08:43 PM
Federal Vital-Shok Nolser Partition, or Federal Premium? younggun308 Guns 20 06-07-2007 02:21 AM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:29 PM.