Quote:
ORIGINAL: diehardhunter
I will be going on a elk hunt in a couple years and am trying to decide what bullet I should shoot from my .300 win mag. Have any of you taken an elk with a sst. I am kind of worried they wont hold up on a big elk.
Thanks,
Die Hard
15 Days! Woohoo
|
I had this same question, & I asked the Hornady folx what they thought. My exchange with them is shown below.
HOWEVER, my last time at the range, I noticed that the 180 SST's were tearing apart pretty well, & I decided for this hunt to go back to the 165 IB's. I had wanted to shoot some stax o' wet newspapers to be sure, but time won't permit: I leave in8 days for beautiful BC!
As for their remarks about shoulder shots, I'd usually agree. However, my guide told me last year to break them down ASAP, and after seeing how thick the timber is in the East Kutenays, I don't blame him 1 bit!
Good luck in your choice,
FC
************************************************** ****
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 6:07 AM
To: Webmaster
Subject: Just Curious...
Why don't you offer the 180 grain Interbond in your .30-'06 Factory Loaded Ammo, whenyou offer the SST in that weight? My rifle loves the 165 Interbonds, & I'd like to try the 180's, but I'm not a hand loader. Just Curious,
Well it seems we didn't think of it!Sounds kind of stupid but you know you get busy and overlook the obvious. There really won't be an advantage since the 30-06 can't drive a 180 grain bullet fast enough that you really need the bonding technology, but you aren't the first who's asked so we will probably have it ready for next year.
Interesting... So, does that mean that the 180 grain SST Interlocks will hold together well enough to crunch bones on an elk without disintegrating? Whodathunkit??? Thanks for the reply!
In my opinion yes, at least that's what we've used on elk and Kudu. Most of the time you wouldn't generally shoot for the shoulder bone on an elk, or anything else for that matter, but if you have to break it down I wouldn't hesitate.