bearklr

I've never used one but I have to agree with the too many moving parts theory. Basically, any bow on the market today can be equally as accurate as the next if set up and tuned properly. There is also a vast selection of conventional bows with a wide range of draw cycles so finding the one that suits you the best shouldn't be that difficult either. Becuase of this I don't see how this bow can perform that much better and still make it worth itto take on the added risk of all those moving parts. To me they seem as though they would be another failure point. I guess my point is that I have shot countless different bows and had all of them shooting bullet holes so I don't see an advantage to throwing more potential problems into the mix.